Labour Biding Time – Wisdom or Caution?


 Labour Biding Time – Wisdom or Caution?

If we are to believe the polls, Labour has a good chance of achieving a majority at the next election.  Labour leader, Ed Miliband assures us that New Labour is history, and his Party are painfully aware that the electorate feel betrayed by The New Labour experiment.

The electorate are angry to be saddled with an extreme right-wing government, led by a Tory Party which did not get an overall majority.

The fixed term parliament is a double edged sword. It does mean that the Tories can’t decide to send a surprise Task Force off to the Falklands to boost its popularity as it did in 1982, and then call a snap election ( is it really a coincidence that it’s in the News again?) However it also means that we have to endure five full years of an extreme government which does not expect to be re-elected and so is determined to inflict as much damage on the electorate, making it doubly difficult for an incoming government.

Timing is all, many, ill-thought-out Coalition policies have had to be shelved, and it is important that Labour have the right policies and Labour don’t want to appear rushed or hasty. But lingering also gives the impression of a hesitant and fearful Party. I am sensing Labour is beginning to look stronger and more forceful in taking on the Coalition, but clear, straight talking is needed. It’s not enough to depend on the Coaltion failing, and how to counteract the government blaming the austerity and cuts on a previous government rather than the Banks? Labour must present convincing policies about how to overcome the stranglehold of the Big Six energy companies, and tax injustice.

The promise of a job guarantee for the long term unemployed on a living wage will be welcome, will lift spirits, lead to growth and recovery.

The following Big Five Policies are just a beginning, (Fabian Society), but are a good foundation on which to build.

  • A guaranteed job for everyone facing long-term unemployment, paid from falling social security rolls and some equivalent of the 1997 windfall tax on excess profits
  • A massive house building programme including a million affordable homes, funded by future rents and sales
  • Merging social care into the NHS, with health bodies commissioning community support and care, but with richer older people paying more towards the costs
  • Increased hours of free childcare to boost  employment for mothers (and some fathers), a move that might possibly pay for itself
  • High-status vocational and workplace training from 14 to pension age, with state funding for courses that boost long-term prospects in the middle of the labour market

Labour also knows it needs to reach out to the public beyond its members, and show it is listening. The “People’s Policy Forum” is symbolic of a change in the culture of the Labour Party, and it is pleasing to hear.

LabPost Labourposters

It’s not enough to depend on the Coaltion failing, but how will Labour counteract the government blaming the austerity and cuts on the previous government rather than the Banks?

IPPR points out the need for Labour to re-establish its economic argument :

Labour has begun to paint a picture of what ‘One Nation Labour’, unveiled by Ed Miliband last autumn, might mean in terms of a strategic approach to running the economy that is different from both that of the current government and that of the Blair and Brown era. Economic growth, we are told, is to be achieved from the ‘middle out’ – that is, by putting more spending power in the hands of those in employment through such measures as the promotion of the living wage, enhancing the skills and thus the earning power of non-graduates, and tax cuts that benefit the less well paid.

Labour also knows it needs to reach out to the public beyond its members, and show it is listening. The “People’s Policy Forum” is symbolic of a change in the culture of the Labour Party, and it is pleasing to hear.

We will not treat the British people like fools – we want to hear what everyone has to say, says Angela Eagle.

New Statesman

This Saturday, Ed Miliband and Labour’s shadow cabinet will join nearly two thousand members of the public in Birmingham. The “People’s Policy Forum” is one of many opportunities for members of the public to shape Labour’s offer to the British people in 2015. The Conservatives and the Liberal Democrats on the other hand have spent recent weekends addressing party faithful at spring conferences. While they are concerned with resolving internal disputes, Labour is united and looking outwards, talking to the public rather than talking to itself.

With just over two years to go until the election, people want to know what One Nation Labour offers as an alternative to this unfair and incompetent government.

This is encouraging to hear. Let us all hope that Labour biding time in formulating policies and convincing the lost voters of change is wise, and entrenched with confidence, commitment and self-belief, and not hesitation and fear about the Press – we’ve been there before.

23rd March Speech:   Ed Miliband:  One Nation Britain can prevent a lost decade

See Also:

  1. The New Statesman People’s Policy  Forum is Symbolic of a Change in the Labour Party
  2. Austerity and the Labour Party 
  3. The Fabian Society: Labour’s next State: The Big Five.
  4. IPPR Time for Labour to establish credibility 
  5. Straight Talking Labour
  6. Labour Puzzles Potential Voters about their Intent
  7. Falklands War turned Tory Fortunes

Labour Puzzles Potential Voters about their Intent


Labour Puzzles Potential Voters about their Intent 

People everywhere reject the Bankers’ Politics of neoliberalism and look to a future of People’s Politics and a kinder and fairer society, where people matter not bankers’ vaults and spreadsheets.  People around Britain are looking for a party which really means change, and yet some are puzzled by some in the Labour Party and are hearing mixed messages from the Party. The electorate knows what the government needs to do, so why are Labour holding back? Is it the old chestnut of fear of the Press? Is Labour aiming for Aneurin Bevan’s Socialist Ideal, or will the Party settle for a Cosy Consensus?  Speak up, take courage, Labour  and push  towards a “Courageous State!”

Everyone needs a society where children can grow up in homes, attend good schools, have health care and look to full employment.

Capitalism isnt working - Reuters

Ed Miliband and the party must show the voters that they reject the austerity which is bringing poverty to people, and that they will be strong in opposing the parasitic, cancerous invasion of a very rich, very tiny minority of profiteers who care nothing for people’s welfare, equality or human rights.

2015 will be the biggest opportunity in seventy years for Labour, and the clock is ticking. People will come out and vote for Labour, but the electorate need convincing and it is up to Labour to speak loudly and clearly – and to present polices that will bring about real change. Many ex-Labour voters will remember how we cheered in 1997 as eighteen years of a callous,  vicious, destructive Conservative government came to an end. Many also remember how the cheering went chillingly quiet as they witnessed  a betrayal by the “New Labour”  government which continued to support a free-for-all smash-and-grab neoliberalism which Thatcher had deceptively introduced, and along with the US and Tory support led to war in Iraq. Their Party had been kidnapped.

Ed Miliband has attacked the previous Labour government and said they did not do enough for ordinary people.

He said that New Labour was “too timid in enforcing rights and responsibilities, especially at the top, and it was too sanguine about the consequences of the rampant free markets”.

He said: “By the time we left office too many of people of Britain didn’t feel as if the Labour party was open to their influence, or listening to them,” Miliband said.

“For me, the most obvious example is immigration. I bow to nobody in my celebration of the multi-ethnic, diverse nature of Britain. But high levels of migration were having huge effects on the lives of people in Britain – and too often those in power seemed not to accept this.

“The fact that they didn’t explains partly why people turned against us in the last general election.

“We have to move on from New Labour, as well as from this Government.”

Miliband told the event in central London that if Labour wins the next general election it would have to find ways of achieving change while tackling a lingering deficit.

“One Nation Labour has learnt the lessons of the financial crisis. It begins from the truth that New Labour did not do enough to bring about structural change in our economy to make it work for the many, not just the few. It did not do enough to change the rules of the game that were holding our economy back.”

He said,” “We cannot have two nations divided between those who own their own homes and those who rent,” Miliband said.

“Most people who rent have responsible landlords and rental agencies. But there are too many rogue landlords and agencies either providing accommodation which is unfit or ripping off their tenants. And too many families face the doubt of a two-month notice period before being evicted.” This is very  good to hear, and is a start. It gives hope to many.

It’s not as if the country supports this government, its austerity, or ever did. The Tories knew this which is why they pushed through their first legislation for a fixed term parliament  ensuring the success of the hatchet-plan of total destruction of  the welfare state in one single term of office. In 2010, the Tories failed in their attempt to gain a majority, and many left-leaning-liberal-voters, many of them ex-Labour voters, felt doubly-betrayed as an opportunist Liberal Democrat Party propped up a government  which turned out to be even more right-wing and reactionary than Thatcher’s.

It’s not what the electorate voted for or wanted at all, so unsurprisingly  we have seen angry protests  and “Occupy”  Movements, unions taking industrial action and anger from people who have never been politically active before. Labour must stand firm against this government, and speak loudly and clearly.

The electorate also needs to believe that a future Labour government will be strong, not timid, and not buckle to the press. The electorate needs to know that Labour will bring about economic changes which will bring about a real redistribution of wealth, by tackling tax law and injustice. The electorate needs to know that it can depend on Labour bringing energy, water and transport back into democratic ownership and control.

The electorate needs to know Labour means what it says and says what it means.  Why are we receiving mixed messages from the Labour party? Why, this week have some ( exclusions here) supported the government’s Workfare programme? Quite rightly, potential voters remain puzzled about what and who Labour represents, and they will withhold their trust and confidence in a party where Blairite vestiges still remain. Stronger, clearer messages from Labour is what the electorate is hungry for. If Labour can’t do that, the voters will look elsewhere and the greatest opportunity for socialism in seventy years will be lost to theorists.  That would be a betrayal which will never, ever, be forgiven.

  • LABOUR – First and foremost, Labour must be honest about the deficit –  and  expose the lies!  Of all the lies, none is bigger than the suggestion that the national debt is the highest ever. 
  • Debt DataDeliberate confusion is created regarding the difference between national debt and deficit. Lies about privatization of the services such as NHS, education and even the police. Lies that cuts are necessary, that we are all in it together, while the rich accrue obscene wealth while trampling on the death and decay they have created. Democracy around the world is held in hostage. US lobbyists are even infiltrating the elections of police commissioners (Telegraph report)  , and many MPs hold contacts with financiers (Britain Under Siege, Think Left) . Power snatched from the people is held by the very rich and echoes the Middle Ages, a neofeudalism . The corporations control think-tanks  which decide policy, and hide their identities. Was this the intention of those who fought for the vote, for workers’ rights, and for equality?


Confident, courageous and compassionate, Labour must seek to pursue the policies which will change our world.

We call upon Labour to:

  1. BE TRUTHFUL ABOUT THE STRUCTURAL DEFICIT AND NATONAL DEBT.a) Structural deficit & Libor . bThe Fundamental deceit of ‘”There’s no money left.” 
  2. CONFRONT THE PARASITIC BANKING COMMUNITY Monetise or rip up the £375bn debt they’ve bought back by QE and reduce the national debt of the UK with the stroke of a key. a) Simon says: QE is the biggest confidence trick of all time  b) What is George Osborne playing at?  c) The IMF and Taking the Red Pill, Think Left 
  4. REGAIN SOVEREIGN CONTROL OVER MONEY SUPPLY How debt leads to financial servitude 
  6. WORK FOR FULL EMPLOYMENT for those that can work, maintaining a safety net for those who cannot.
  19. REBUILD OUR COMMUNITIES, libraries, youth services, sports facilities, high streets and local co-ops.
  1. Aneurin Bevan’s Socialist Ideal, or the Cosy Consensus? 
  2. Richard Murphy: The Cowardly State is in Disarray, we need a Courageous Alternative
  3. Osborne and Cameron’s Big Deficit Myth
  4. Huffington Post Ed Miliband attacks New Labour – 
  5. The Fundamental Deceit of “there’s no money left”
  6. Parliament of the People
  7. Straight Talking Labour
  8. Owen Jones: Independent: Workfare Why did so many Labour MPs accept this brutal, unforgivable attack on vulnerable people?
  9. Left Futures: What was Liam Byrne playing at?

Policies Labour must adopt to address Gender Inequality.


Women in the Uk are increasing turning to the Labour Party, aware of the hollow promises from Coalition parties (made up in 2010 MPs of 16% (Con) and 12% (LibDems), whose austerity policies have really hit women hard. If Labour are elected, there is much work to be done and it is imperative that Labour’s agenda for women is radical and Labour’s straight-talking is heard by the electorate.

Labour must fully  take on board all recommendations from the recent study from the Fawcett Society “Sex and Power in 2013, “Who Runs Britain?”

The report makes six recommendations:

–       Political parties should take immediate action to increase the number of women candidates at all levels of election with a view to fielding as many women candidates from as wide a variety of backgrounds and communities as possible in winnable seats in 2015. This should include active consideration of positive action measures in selection processes.

–       In order to enable everyone concerned to develop a much better understanding of the issues, a monitoring form similar to that used in recruitment for public appointments and applications for funding should be introduced. It would be completed and submitted to returning officers by all candidates together with nomination forms at all levels of election, and the results collated and published annually. This requirement should be implemented at the 2014 English local and European elections.

–       Government should pilot a new government-wide scheme in 2014 to increase women’s presence, profile and participation in the 2015 general election and beyond. This could be done by drawing together experience from the UK and abroad which could be used to improve both the participation and the candidacy of women of all backgrounds in Britain.

–       Government, political parties and others should act to implement the recommendations of the Speaker’s Conference Report published in 2010.

–       In addition to adopting the proposals for cultural change in public life contained in reports such as the Speaker’s Conference, the Councillors’ Commission, and the Equality and Human Rights Commission’s Pathways to Politics, steps should be taken to develop a much wider set of proposals for improving the culture of both politics at all levels and the media coverage of them.

–       All organisations – public, private and third sector – should take steps to ensure that, at meetings and events, both women and men appear on platforms as speakers, and editors and broadcasters should also take responsibility for commissioning contributions from both women and men as commentators and experts. Individual citizens should be encouraged by to object to men-only platforms, panels and programmes.

Labour must also consider and implement  the following policies addressing gender inequality.

o Recognising the impact of cuts affecting women, Labour must develop policies to reverse these effects. In opposition Labour should address the issues and ensure the Coalition government is held to account for their actions.

o Implement the policy proposed by Harriet Harman that either Party Leader or Deputy Leader must be female. A balanced team of men and women make better decisions.

o Set up consultation groups in areas of deprivation inviting women to put forward suggestions, which will help improve their lives.

o Alongside the move for the Leader of the Labour Party to choose the Shadow Cabinet, it is paramount that the voice of women needs to be maintained. A minimum of 40% of the Cabinet or Shadow Cabinet, should be women members; this percentage being raised to 50% over 5 years.

o Set up consultations with women within parties, workplaces, trade unions, women’s groups as to how to support them to further become involved in local decision making within local councils.

o Flexible maternity/paternity leave on full pay.

o In the workplace, ensure equal pay and conditions, including part-time workers, and a living wage to bring all low-paid workers out of poverty.

o All communities should provide good quality care and support for the elderly, disabled and mentally ill people, both helping them and relieving the burden of care from so many women.

o Continue with short listing of women candidates in selection of parliamentary candidates, until proportional and equal representation of women and men in the parliamentary Labour Party is met and maintained.

o There needs to be a reassessment of procedures and practices within local government and parliament and an investigation to ascertain how women could be included more and how they would like to become more involved in making decisions which affect them.

o Consult with women’s groups regarding issues for women, recognising women do not always engage with mainstream party political meetings, and set up workgroups with aims of addressing these issues.

o Respite for carers of one day a week to be funded.

o Playgroup Provision of free 5 hours p/w offered to every child from two years

o Nursery Education provision of free 15 hours p/w offered to every child from three years.

o Pursue universal affordable childcare policy , as proposed by Think Left.

o Amendments to the Equality Act should be reversed.

o Develop a Women’s Act that would enshrine women’s rights in policy-making and implementation.

o Increase benefit income in order to improve the lives of women living in poverty and support their families’ well-being;

o Reverse the cuts to SureStart Centres

o Women and girls must have equal access to education and training. That must include crèche facilities for parents returning to work or study, after time off to care for children. In our schools we must ensure an end to sex differentiation in the subjects offered to girl and boys.

o Improve access to education, flexible and varied methods of study and access to a life long Qualification Pathway so improving the quality of life for women and improving their employment prospects.

o Pursue an affordable housing policy so that women are not held in a poverty trap where they cannot work because of loss of housing benefits.

o Women must have the freedom to choose whether or not to have children without punishment for their choice. There must be free, safe and reliable contraception available. The access to the right to termination of pregnancy where there is agreement for two doctors should remain, within guidelines recommended by medical professionals. A woman who exercises her right to terminate her pregnancy should be offered counselling before and after the procedure. She does not do so lightly, and must be treated with respect and sensitivity.

o Safety from sexual/domestic violence. All individuals who are victimised should have access to safe rehousing if necessary.

o Sexual harassment and discrimination in the workplace creates misery for many women, and there should be active promotion of policies in the workplace to eradicate this.

o A 35-hour working week, and flexibility for part-time work.


  1. The Fawcett Society: Sex and Power in 2013
  2. Think Left: The Foot that Kicks the Cradle rules the world
  3. Think Left: Women and Children First
  4. Think Left: Women as Voters and MPs
  5. Think Left: A Bold Approach To Child Care
  6. Think Left: Poor Brum (Think Left)
  7. Think Left: Becoming a Member of Parliament

Austerity and the Labour Party


The consequences of austerity

The Financial Times (as reported by Leftfootforward) set out a series of graphs which indicate the negative effect of austerity policies on the GDP of various European economies.  The graph reproduced below shows clearly the negative correlation:

Picture 37


Paul Krugman creates his own similar graph in the NY Times and writes that the graphs show that  “… the greater the tightening between 2009 and 2012, according to the International Monetary Fund, the bigger the fall in output.”

He adds:

In normal life, a result like this would be considered overwhelming confirmation of the proposition that austerity has large negative impacts. Yes, you can concoct elaborate stories about how it could be wrong; but it’s really reaching. It seems safe to say that what we have here is a case in which rival theories made different predictions, the predictions of one theory proved completely wrong while those of the other were totally vindicated — but in which adherents of the failed theory, for political and ideological reasons, refuse to accept the facts.

So what exactly does Paul Krugman mean?

He means that the ‘experiment’, conducted by Deficit Hawks such as George Osborne.. in implementing the remedies proposed by Neoclassical economics… has been shown to be completely wrong… but, for political and ideological reasons, the Hawks refuse to accept the facts.

Furthermore, he argues that the Deficit Doves, the Neo-Keynesians such as himself and Ed Balls, have been shown to be vindicated.

This is the case up to a point… but the problem is that the Deficit Doves are saying that whilst in the short term, the economy needs a Keynesian fiscal stimulus, in the medium to long term, the Deficit Hawks’ medicine of cuts will be necessary.

Hence, we have the Labour shadow cabinet only criticizing Osborne and the Coalition for cutting too hard and too fast rather than completely rejecting the fundamental argument for ‘austerity’ measures.   This is a profoundly weak argument but I would argue that it is also bad economics … and leads to policy decisions which in no way reflect the views of the grassroots LP.

As Michael Meacher writes:

What Labour needs now to make clear beyond any doubt is that the Osborne massacre of the innocent isn’t inevitable and that killing a few less and doing it in a slower and more kindly fashion is no answer either.   The only way to deal with the deficit in the pit of a deepening recession is through a huge programme of public investment where it is sorely needed – social housing, improved infrastructure, low-carbon economy – funded by quantitative easing (instead of throwing the money at the banks), taxation of the ultra-rich (who caused the recession and have contributed nothing to remedying it), instructing RBS and Lloyds (after all, we own them) to prioritise lending to to major agreed manufacturing projects, or borrowing at rock-bottom interest rates to generate a million jobs within 2 years.   


Michael Meacher is a Deficit owl, not a Defict Dove.

The Neo-Keynesian approach accepts that cuts in government spending will need to be made in the medium to long term.  Hence, the Labour leadership does not sufficiently vigorously oppose the Tory/LD cuts and privatisation of public services.  This adds another layer of incomprehensibility because it is not simply that austerity fails to make macro-economic sense but there is also no doubt that the cuts and privatization of public services will ultimately increase costs to the state (not to mention the human costs).

This is amply demonstrated by Matt Dykes who writes:

… beyond the acute economic problems, the UK is also in the midst of a very real ‘social recession’. As with the economy, the double whammy of crisis and austerity is plunging public services across the country into a vicious circle of decline.

He reproduces a ‘useful pictorial representation’ published in ‘Perfect Storms’ by Children England, which demonstrates how the economic crisis and government cuts impact on the provision of children’s services by local authorities and community groups alike.

Picture 40


It is clear from this diagram just how disastrous ‘the government’s needless and self-defeating cult of austerity’ is for children’s services, and how the cuts are storing up future problems … doubtless this same picture could be extrapolated across the whole of public services.

So why are there still many ‘senior figures from the discredited New Labour network (such as Patrick Diamond, former adviser to Blair-Brown, in the Guardian today) who continue to repeat the mantra of ‘financial discipline’ – as if we hadn’t had a bellyfull of this already from Osborne (and with 70% of cuts still to come) – yet with nothing but an imminent triple dip recession to show for it.   They show lip service to a growth strategy without giving any idea how it might seriously be achieved, since merely tweaking the Osborne cuts agenda – cutting less far, less fast – is just a recipe for economic decline, but a bit more slowly than the Tories?’ (Michael Meacher)

John McDonnell MP, suggests that “The Labour leadership comes from a neo-liberal background. They served their apprenticeship deep in the heart of New Labour and they’re looking to come back as New Labour mark two, slightly reformed but not challenging the system itself.”  He argues that it is the role of Labour’s left to make issues “safe” for the party’s leadership. “If you make an issue safe, Ed Miliband will shift. Whether it’s Murdoch, banks, welfare or benefits  But I don’t think they’ll just shift cynically, they’ll shift on to the terrain that is then safe, and you can have a proper discussion then.”  

This fits with part of Ed Balls’ 2010 Bloomberg speech, in which he emphasizes the lesson that ‘.. it’s not enough to be right if you don’t win the argument.  For – as Keynes found in 1925 and 1931 and Alan Walters found in 1990 – being right in the long run and well-judged by history is no great comfort.’ (A video clip of this speech is included  below the references – well worth watching in the light of the last 2.5y of Osbornomics.)

John McDonnell is spot on.  The role of the left, both within and without the LP, must be to educate, agitate and organise to make it ‘safe’ enough for the Labour leadership to adopt measures such as direct government investment into the real economy to create jobs, houses, restore the welfare state and mitigate climate change.  As Michael Meacher concludes:

‘Take your pick – more Osborne, more New Labour, or something the voters of Eastleigh might well have gone for rather than UKIP.’

What we need is a Labour leadership team full of Deficit Owls!  

Economics in crisis – it needs a ‘Reformation’

The number of calls to the NSPCC’s child neglect line doubled between 2009/10 and 2011/12

From 2009/10 to 2010/11, the number of children in need increased by 42,400, with an 8 per cent increase in child protection plans.

Since 2007, there has been a 9 per cent increase in the number of looked after children.

By 2015, there will be 115,000 more children living in families with four or more vulnerabilities (defined by the Cabinet Office)

Ed Balls’ 2010 Bloomberg speech – ‘There is an alternative’