Reactions to Republican Vice Presidential Candidate Paul Ryan’s Speech

Thom Hartmann has explained how Wanninski’s ‘Two Santa Clauses’ theory has allowed the Republicans to con America for the last 30 years (1).  Paul Ryan is simply the latest, and perhaps most overt, exponent.  Nevertheless, the ‘audaciousness’ of the ‘misspeaking’ in his speech, to the Republican Convention in Tampa (29.08.12) has provoked a welcome reaction from some parts of the media.  Although, how much of this negative press will percolate through to the US electorate is not clear.

Reactions to Ryan’s speech: “Breathtakingly dishonest,” “demonstrably misleading,” “a staggering, staggering lie.” twitter.com/truthteam2012/…— TruthTeam2012 (@truthteam2012) August 30, 2012

The top five ‘demonstrably misleading’ statements were:

1)  On Medicare

“And the biggest, coldest power play of all in Obamacare came at the expense of the elderly … So they just took it all away from Medicare. Seven hundred and sixteen billion dollars, funneled out of Medicare by President Obama.”

‘Politifact has weighed in on Ryan’s Medicare claim and found it to be “mostly false” and Ryan knows that it is.  His budget contains the same $716bn cuts in Medicare spending.

2) The Janesville GM plant

‘A lot of guys I went to high school with worked at that GM plant. Right there at that plant, Obama said: ‘I believe that if our government is there to support you … this plant will be here for another hundred years.’ That’s what he said in 2008. Well, as it turned out, that plant didn’t last another year.’

The plant laid off most of its workforce in December 2008, before Obama took office. Furthermore,  Mitt Romney, wrote in the New York Times in November 2008  ‘Let Detroit Go Bankrupt.’

3)  Government debt

[Obama] created a bipartisan debt commission. They came back with an urgent report. He thanked them, sent them on their way and then did exactly nothing.

Paul Ryan was on that same bipartisan debt commission, and voted no to the committee’s draft report.  His vote, along with two others, caused the report to fail to be passed, so no wonder Obama did nothing.  Facts that Paul Ryan neglected to mention in his speech.

4)  Aid to the poor

We have responsibilities, one to another – we do not each face the world alone. And the greatest of all responsibilities, is that of the strong to protect the weak. The truest measure of any society is how it treats those who cannot defend or care for themselves … We can make the safety net safe again.

Paul Krugman wrote about Paul Ryan (2):

‘In general, I’m a numbers and concepts guy, not a feelings guy; when I go after someone like Paul Ryan, I emphasize his irresponsibility and dishonesty, not his evident lack of empathy for the less fortunate.

Still, there are times — in Ryan’s case and more generally for much of his political tribe — when that lack of empathy just takes your breath away. 

Harold Pollack catches Ryan calling his proposed cuts in Medicaid, food stamps and more welfare reform round two, and suggests that our current suite of safety net programs is “a hammock that lulls able-bodied people to lives of dependency and complacency”.

Oh. My. God.’

Paul Ryan has established his reputation with the Republican base, by a Tea Party-infused plan for massive debt cuts.  He is committed to huge cuts in federal spending, especially welfare, and  ’budget-busting tax cuts’ for the wealthy.

5)  Credit rating downgrade

It began with a perfect Triple-A credit rating for the United States; it ends with a downgraded America.

The US was downgraded from AAA to AA+ in August 2011 because of the refusal by Republicans in Congress to vote to raise the debt ceiling.  The ratings agency, Standard and Poor’s blamed : “The political brinksmanship of recent months highlights what we see as America’s governance and policymaking becoming less stable, less effective, and less predictable than what we previously believed.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/aug/30/paul-ryans-speech-audacious-untruths

All of which bears out Edward S Herman’s conclusion in ‘Beyond Hypocrisy’ (3):

 The structure of power that shapes media choices and determines who gains access also affects truthfulness in the mass media.

Those who have assured access can lie; the more powerful they are, the more easily they can lie and the less likely it is that their lies will be corrected.

The higher the rank the more “credible” the statement; the more credible the speaker, the greater the freedom to lie. 

The global dominance of the US means that the candidates for this year’s presidential elections are of great importance for the rest of the world .. but non-Americans are unfortunately disenfranchised.  What a good thing we do not have politicians who blatantly lie in the UK… Oh but hang on….

(1)   https://think-left.org/2012/08/20/has-george-osborne-been-taking-trans-atlantic-lessons-from-the-jude-wanniski-and-the-republicans/

(2)  https://think-left.org/2012/08/11/is-george-osborne-the-uks-equivalent-of-tea-party-hero-paul-ryan/

(3)  https://think-left.org/2012/08/29/the-unfree-flow-of-information-and-cyberspace/

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s